Calendar

November 2006
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

My Flickr Feed

LolipopFeeding The DucksDSC_2200stepswall2wall1arrowsfinscurvessquares

Why are closed formats bad?

Closed formats are bad for everyone, not just geeks. The sooner people get this the better for us all.

If you buy music online in the closed DRM protected content formats, you’re stuffed when it comes to the basic rights you have to use and do as you will with your own belongings. The track does not work like a single you buy on CD..

If you use Office, and use a closed format, then chances are somewhere down the line, like in the past, you can’t open files in later versions of Office even.

Microsoft have been pushing their “Plays for Sure” logo, just more MS marketing to convince the unwitting public that MS are the way to go, and we can buy with confidence.. This is supposed to mean that when you buy from a service that uses their locked technology you can be sure it will play.

Unfortunately, MS are now releasing a new “Ipod Killer”, which doesn’t play for sure at all. This is always going to be the problem. If geeks can’t play, then it’s bad for everyone.

Get using open formats. MP3 isn’t open, but at least it’s not DRM. Ogg is the best bet. It’s better quality, but there’s a smaller amount of players out there.. But if we push for open formats then it will happen.

It worked for Office documents. The international standards body opted for an open document format (OASIS) which is supported by openoffice, and because the law has been altered in many states and countries to use only open formats for government work, Office is going to have to support this too.

In summary

Open == good – if you want a totally open experience, choose Ubuntu

Close == bad, if you want a totally closed experience, choose Windows

2 comments to Why are closed formats bad?